Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Antioxidative Activities of Natural Hydroxy-Bearing Cinnamaldehydes and Cinnamic Acids: A Comparative Study

Hong Jiang2, Sheng-Ling Sun3, Chao Zhang2, Erdong Yuan1, Qing-Yi Wei1 , Zhen Zeng2

1College of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640; 2Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070; 3State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.

For correspondence:-  Qing-Yi Wei   Email: feweiqingyi@scut.edu.cn   Tel:+8602087112594

Received: 2 November 2013        Accepted: 9 October 2013        Published: 24 December 2013

Citation: Jiang H, Sun S, Zhang C, Yuan E, Wei Q, Zeng Z. Antioxidative Activities of Natural Hydroxy-Bearing Cinnamaldehydes and Cinnamic Acids: A Comparative Study. Trop J Pharm Res 2013; 12(6):1017-1022 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i6.22

© 2013 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the potent antioxidants among six hydroxy-bearing cinnamaldehyde compounds and their corresponding acids.
Methods: The antioxidative activities were evaluated by scavenging 2, 2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals and anti-hemolysis of human red blood cells (RBCs). Fourier transform infrared spectrometryA288;FT-IR, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMRA289;and mass spectrometer(MS) evaluations were used to determine the synthesized compounds.
Results: The scavenging ability of the compounds on DPPH radicals was in the following rank order: caffeic aldehyde (F) ≈ caffeic acid (C) > vitamin C (Vc) > o-coumaraldehyde (D) > p-coumaric acid (B) > p-coumaraldehyde (E) ≈o-coumaric acid. Inhibitory ability against 2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced erythrocyte hemolysis was ranked as follows: o-coumaraldehyde (D) > p-coumaraldehyde (E) ≈ caffeic aldehyde (F) > caffeic acid (C) ≈o-coumaric acid (A) > p-coumaric acid (B) > Vitamin C. The corresponding inhibition time (tinh ) of D and Vc was 63.6, and 23.7 min, respectively.
Conclusion: Cinnamaldehydes demonstrated superior antioxidative activities to their corresponding acids. DPPH scavenging ability correlated directly with the number of hydroxyl groups on the catechol ring while the degree of lipophilicity of the compounds may be proportional to their anti-hemolytic activity.

Keywords: DPPH scavenging, Cinnamaldehyde, Cinnamic acid, Antioxidative, Hemolysis

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates